New entity of adult ultra-short coeliac disease: the first international cohort and case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Ultra-short coeliac disease (USCD) is defined as villous atrophy only present in the duodenal bulb (D1) with concurrent positive coeliac serology. We present the first, multicentre, international study of patients with USCD. METHODS: Patients with USCD were identified from 10 tertiary hospitals (6 from Europe, 2 from Asia, 1 from North America and 1 from Australasia) and compared with age-matched and sex-matched patients with conventional coeliac disease. FINDINGS: Patients with USCD (n=137, median age 27 years, IQR 21-43 years; 73% female) were younger than those with conventional coeliac disease (27 vs 38 years, respectively, p<0.001). Immunoglobulin A-tissue transglutaminase (IgA-tTG) titres at index gastroscopy were lower in patients with USCD versus conventional coeliac disease (1.8×upper limit of normal (ULN) (IQR 1.1-5.9) vs 12.6×ULN (IQR 3.3-18.3), p<0.001).Patients with USCD had the same number of symptoms overall (median 3 (IQR 2-4) vs 3 (IQR 1-4), p=0.875). Patients with USCD experienced less iron deficiency (41.8% vs 22.4%, p=0.006).Both USCD and conventional coeliac disease had the same intraepithelial lymphocytes immunophenotype staining pattern; positive for CD3 and CD8, but not CD4.At follow-up having commenced a gluten-free diet (GFD) (median of 1181 days IQR: 440-2160 days) both USCD and the age-matched and sex-matched controls experienced a similar reduction in IgA-tTG titres (0.5 ULN (IQR 0.2-1.4) vs 0.7 ULN (IQR 0.2-2.6), p=0.312). 95.7% of patients with USCD reported a clinical improvement in their symptoms. INTERPRETATION: Patients with USCD are younger, have a similar symptomatic burden and benefit from a GFD. This study endorses the recommendation of D1 sampling as part of the endoscopic coeliac disease diagnostic workup.

What are the clinical consequences of 'potential' coeliac disease?

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the clinical consequences of potential coeliac disease (PCD). AIM: To compare the presentation of PCD with coeliac disease (CD). METHODS: A retrospective study of adult PCD patients (>18 years) was performed. Presenting manifestations, serology and HLA-DQ genotyping were compared to an age-at-diagnosis and sex-matched CD cohort. RESULTS: The PCD cohort comprised 84 patients (median age 37 years, 63% female). The majority of PCD patients were symptomatic at presentation (PCD 91.7% versus CD cohort 94.0%, p = 0.55). In total, 79.8% and 76.2% of the PCD and CD cohorts respectively reported ≥1 gastrointestinal symptoms at presentation (p = 0.58). Extraintestinal presentation was less common in PCD than CD (65.5% versus 79.8% respectively, p = 0.038). PCD patients had fewer haematinic deficiencies than those with CD (iron 21.4% versus 41.7%, p = 0.005, vitamin D 14.3% versus 27.4%, p = 0.037 and folate deficiency 7.1% versus 28.6%, p= <0.001.) Post-diagnosis, 67.5% of the PCD patients chose a GFD. One-third of the patients who continued to eat gluten developed villous atrophy. CONCLUSION: The presentation of PCD and CD differ; however, mild enteropathy does not necessarily equate to mild symptoms. The GFD appears to be advantageous in symptomatic PCD.

Why Is There Medical Inertia and Nihilism to Celiac Disease? Comment on Pivetta et al. In Elderly Anemic Patients without Endoscopic Signs of Bleeding Are Duodenal Biopsies Always Necessary to Rule out Celiac Disease? Diagnostics 2022, 12, 678.

We read, with interest, the paper entitled "In Elderly Anemic Patients without Endoscopic Signs of Bleeding Are Duodenal Biopsies Always Necessary to Rule Out Celiac Disease [...].